Ronin S vs. RS 3: A Detailed Comparison Between the Two DJI Gimbals

When choosing between the DJI Ronin S and the DJI RS 3, the decision often comes down to balancing budget, features, and functionality. While the Ronin S offers a solid baseline for creators at a more affordable price, the RS 3 packs newer features and enhanced performance, making it a powerful choice for serious filmmakers. This article will walk you through all the key differences to help you choose the best stabilizer for your needs.

In short: If you’re looking for cutting-edge stabilization technology, lighter weight, and advanced functionality, the RS 3 is the better option. However, for those who want a reliable and cost-effective solution, the Ronin S remains a viable choice.

DJI Ronin S vs. RS 3: Key Features Comparison

Weight and Portability

The weight and portability of a gimbal are critical for long shoots, especially if you need to be mobile. The Ronin S weighs approximately 1.84 kg (4.06 lbs), making it a sturdy option but challenging to handle for extended periods. On the other hand, the RS 3 is lighter, weighing only 1.3 kg (2.87 lbs), and is designed with portability in mind. Its compact size and auto-lock mechanism make it easy to transport and set up. In practical terms, the RS 3’s lightweight frame makes it a superior choice for event videographers and content creators who need to stay nimble.

Additionally, the RS 3 offers automatic axis locks that engage as soon as you power off the gimbal, making it easier to pack and unpack. The Ronin S, with its manual locks, requires a bit more time and attention during setup and breakdown, which can be cumbersome during a fast-paced shoot.

Payload Capacity

Payload capacity is a key consideration, especially when dealing with heavier camera rigs. The Ronin S can support up to 3.6 kg (7.9 lbs), which makes it ideal for a wide range of DSLR and mirrorless setups. However, it struggles to maintain balance with heavier cine lenses and accessories.

In contrast, the RS 3 is rated for a slightly lower maximum payload of 3 kg (6.6 lbs), but the RS 3 Pro variant expands this capacity to a robust 4.5 kg (9.9 lbs). This makes the RS 3 Pro a better option for larger cinema cameras and professional setups. The inclusion of a fine-tuning knob on the tilt axis in the RS 3 allows for quicker and more precise balancing of heavier rigs—a feature the Ronin S lacks.

Stabilization Performance

Stabilization is at the heart of any gimbal system, and both the Ronin S and RS 3 perform admirably. However, the RS 3, equipped with upgraded motors and a newer stabilization algorithm, provides smoother footage, especially in dynamic shooting scenarios. The RS 3 also features a newly designed stabilization system that reduces vibrations and jitters when using heavier setups or during rapid movements.

Real-world tests show that the RS 3 Pro handles heavier payloads and complex movements with better torque and precision, making it suitable for tracking shots or when filming in challenging environments. The Ronin S, while competent, does not match the RS 3’s stabilization accuracy, particularly when handling larger camera bodies​.

Battery Life

Battery life is fairly comparable between the two gimbals. The Ronin S has a 12-hour runtime on a single charge, making it suitable for long shoots. The RS 3 also offers up to 12 hours of use but benefits from faster charging times and swappable battery packs, which means you can extend shooting sessions indefinitely by carrying spare batteries.

Another advantage of the RS 3 is its USB-C compatibility, allowing for more versatile charging options. This is especially beneficial if you’re on a set without dedicated power sources, as you can use power banks to recharge your gimbal​.

Control and Functionality

The control layout is a major differentiating factor between the Ronin S and RS 3. The RS 3 features a 1.8-inch OLED touchscreen that allows for quick adjustments on the go. Switching between modes such as PF (Pan Follow), PTF (Pan Tilt Follow), and FPV (First Person View) is simpler and more intuitive thanks to this interface. By contrast, the Ronin S relies more on physical buttons and the DJI app for fine-tuning, making it slightly less user-friendly​.

The RS 3’s Bluetooth shutter button is another noteworthy addition, enabling wireless camera control without the need for additional cables. This adds to the overall convenience and makes it easier to start and stop recording without touching the camera—a feature missing on the Ronin S.

Here’s a detailed comparison table to outline things more clearly for you.

Ronin S vs. RS 3: Design and Build Quality

Material and Construction

The build quality is a strong point for both gimbals, but the RS 3 edges out with its use of carbon fiber arms, which are lightweight yet robust. This is a significant upgrade from the Ronin S’s heavier aluminum construction. While both gimbals are designed to withstand the rigors of professional use, the RS 3’s construction offers a better balance of durability and weight savings, making it the preferred choice for run-and-gun scenarios​.

Ergonomics and Comfort

Comfort is crucial for handheld shooting, and the RS 3’s redesigned handle and grip make it easier to hold for long durations. It also includes a rear handle option for two-handed operation, reducing fatigue during extended use. The Ronin S, although well-balanced, can become tiring to use due to its heavier weight and less ergonomic design. For creators who spend hours filming handheld, the RS 3 offers a more comfortable experience​.

Ronin S vs. RS 3: Features and Accessories

The RS 3 Pro Combo ships with a comprehensive set of accessories, including the RavenEye Image Transmitter and the Focus Motor. The RavenEye allows for wireless transmission of video feeds to your smartphone, enabling remote monitoring and control via the DJI app. Additionally, the Focus Motor has been upgraded, providing three times more torque and 50% quieter operation compared to previous models.

The Ronin S, on the other hand, lacks built-in advanced features like ActiveTrack 3.0 and Force Mobile. However, it supports add-ons like a follow focus system, making it possible to expand its functionality.

Ronin S vs. RS 3: Price and Value

Price is a major consideration for many users. The Ronin S, being an older model, is more affordable, typically retailing around $499. The RS 3, with its enhanced features, commands a higher price point, often starting at $549. The RS 3 Pro, with all its bells and whistles, can go up to $869, depending on the accessory bundle. For budget-conscious users, the Ronin S offers good value, but the RS 3 justifies its higher cost through its modern features and superior performance.

Wrapping Up

To summarize, if you’re looking for a gimbal that offers the best in terms of stabilization, ease of use, and modern features, the RS 3 is the clear winner. Its lighter weight, intuitive controls, and future-proof design make it the go-to choice for serious creators. On the other hand, the Ronin S remains a reliable, budget-friendly option for those who don’t need the latest features.