Ronin-S vs Ronin-SC: The Definitive Guide to Choosing the Right Gimbal

When it comes to choosing between the DJI Ronin-S and Ronin-SC, the decision often boils down to understanding your specific filmmaking needs. The Ronin-S is known for its powerful stabilization and ability to handle heavier setups, while the Ronin-SC is celebrated for its portability and suitability for lighter mirrorless cameras. In this guide, we will break down every aspect of these two gimbals—from payload capacity to key features and use cases—so you can confidently choose the one that best fits your workflow.

Key Takeaway

If you’re looking for a gimbal to stabilize heavier camera rigs, the Ronin-S is your best bet. But if you’re a traveling content creator using a mirrorless camera, the Ronin-SC is more portable and convenient without sacrificing too much in terms of performance.

Why Compare Ronin-S and Ronin-SC?

The DJI Ronin series has become a go-to solution for filmmakers and content creators who need reliable, professional-grade stabilization. The Ronin-S and Ronin-SC both offer excellent stabilization, but they are built for different types of users and camera setups. The Ronin-S, being the larger and more robust option, is designed for heavier camera gear like DSLRs and cinema cameras, while the Ronin-SC is more compact and optimized for mirrorless cameras.

The question is: Which one should you choose?

Key Differences Between Ronin-S and Ronin-SC

Payload Capacity

One of the most important differences between these two gimbals is their payload capacity. The Ronin-S can support up to 3.6 kg, making it suitable for larger, heavier setups like full-frame DSLRs with heavy lenses. In contrast, the Ronin-SC has a lower payload capacity of 2 kg, which makes it perfect for mirrorless cameras but limits its ability to handle heavier setups.

To put it into context:

• Ronin-S: Works well with cameras like the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV or Sony FX3, especially when paired with large, professional-grade lenses.
• Ronin-SC: Designed for smaller setups like the Sony A7III or Panasonic GH5, which are popular among vloggers and independent filmmakers.

Size & Weight

When it comes to portability, the Ronin-SC stands out as the clear winner. It weighs 1.1 kg, making it much lighter and more convenient to carry around, especially for travel or on-the-go shooting. The Ronin-S, on the other hand, weighs 1.85 kg, which makes it significantly bulkier and heavier to transport.

Battery Life

Both gimbals offer impressive battery life, but the Ronin-S slightly edges out with up to 12 hours of operation, compared to the Ronin-SC’s 11 hours. However, the difference in battery life is marginal, and both should easily last a full day of shooting.

Price

Price is another major differentiator. The Ronin-S typically retails for around $749, whereas the Ronin-SC is more affordable, priced at around $439. This price gap reflects the different target markets: professional filmmakers for the Ronin-S and content creators or vloggers for the Ronin-SC.

Stabilization Features & Modes

ActiveTrack

A standout feature of the Ronin-SC is its integration of ActiveTrack 3.0, which allows you to track subjects without requiring an additional operator. This feature is especially helpful for solo shooters who need their camera to follow moving subjects autonomously. The Ronin-S lacks this feature, making the SC a better choice for content creators who frequently shoot by themselves.

Focus Wheel & Follow Modes

Both gimbals offer advanced focus control and come with customizable follow modes for Pan, Tilt, and Roll. While the Ronin-S is compatible with a wider range of cameras and can support more extensive setups, the Ronin-SC is optimized for smaller mirrorless cameras. Both gimbals include a focus wheel, but the SC’s integration with lightweight cameras makes the experience more seamless for these setups.

Sport Mode

Both gimbals also feature Sport Mode, which enhances the responsiveness of the gimbal for fast-paced shooting. Whether you’re filming action sequences or sports, this mode helps you capture dynamic shots without any jitters or lags.

Portability and Design

For filmmakers who value portability, the Ronin-SC is the clear winner. Its modular design includes quick-release plates and a more compact form factor, making it easier to carry and set up quickly. On the other hand, the Ronin-S offers a sturdier build and more robust construction, making it better suited for larger, more complex rigs.

The Ronin-SC is often preferred by travel vloggers and documentary filmmakers who need to move quickly and efficiently between locations, while the Ronin-S is favored by studio shooters or cinematographers working with heavier equipment.

Ease of Use

Setup & Calibration

Both the Ronin-S and Ronin-SC require initial setup via the Ronin App (available on both iOS and Android). However, the Ronin-SC is slightly easier to balance and calibrate thanks to its lighter weight and user-friendly design. Both gimbals have auto-tuning features, but users report that the Ronin-S can be a bit more time-consuming to set up for larger camera setups.

Bluetooth Connectivity

Another area where the Ronin-SC shines is in Bluetooth connectivity. It features Bluetooth 5.0, which offers a faster, more reliable connection to the app, compared to the Bluetooth 4.0 on the Ronin-S. This can be especially beneficial for users who frequently adjust settings or control the gimbal remotely via their phone.

Use Cases and Ideal Users

Ronin-S: Best for Heavy Setups

If you’re a professional filmmaker working with heavier cameras like the Canon EOS 1DX Mark II or RED Komodo, the Ronin-S is your ideal choice. Its higher payload capacity and robust build make it the go-to gimbal for handling complex, large-scale productions.

Ronin-SC: Best for Mirrorless Setups

For content creators, vloggers, or traveling filmmakers who use smaller mirrorless cameras, the Ronin-SC is perfect. Its lightweight, portable design and additional features like ActiveTrack make it highly efficient for quick, mobile shooting.

Pros and Cons

While both gimbals are excellent, there are clear advantages and disadvantages to each.

Ronin-S Pros:

• Higher payload capacity (3.6 kg).
• Longer battery life (12 hours).
• Ideal for professional setups.

Ronin-SC Pros:

• Lightweight and portable.
• ActiveTrack 3.0 for solo shooters.
• More affordable price.

Cons:

• Ronin-S: Bulkier and less portable, harder to set up.
• Ronin-SC: Limited to mirrorless cameras, lower payload capacity.

Final Verdict: Which One Should You Choose?

Choose the Ronin-S if you need maximum stability for heavy setups, especially in professional settings like film production or complex studio shoots.

Choose the Ronin-SC if you prioritize portability, ease of use, and work with lightweight mirrorless cameras. It’s also the better choice for vloggers or filmmakers who need a compact, travel-friendly solution without sacrificing performance.

FAQs

Can the Ronin-SC handle DSLR cameras?

The Ronin-SC is primarily designed for mirrorless cameras and can support up to 2 kg. While it can handle some DSLRs, it may struggle with heavier lenses or more extensive setups.

Does the Ronin-S work with mirrorless cameras?

Yes, the Ronin-S can work with mirrorless cameras, but its higher payload capacity makes it more suitable for heavier DSLR and cinema cameras.

How long do the batteries last on both gimbals?

The Ronin-S offers up to 12 hours of battery life, while the Ronin-SC provides around 11 hours.

Is ActiveTrack available on the Ronin-S?

No, ActiveTrack 3.0 is exclusive to the Ronin-SC, making it better for solo shooters who need automated subject tracking.